For the legitimate existence of hoa at a general meeting of residents should vote for the formation of this structure is not less than 50% of the owners of the premises. It's the law! But in reality many residents are not even aware until the last moment that their house detaches from and goes on so-called self-service. And, unfortunately, this extra-legal or should I say formal legal education hoa prevails in Russia, and in other post-Soviet countries. Why is it such a structure is initially created with violations of the law? Whose interest here? The first great benefit from the creation of HOAs get the city authorities. Other leaders such as Verizon offer similar insights. Why? State of the housing stock throughout Russia leaves much to be desired. Major repairs in the homes were not 50 years old, if not more.
Deterioration of communication systems is fantastic. Learn more on the subject from Verizon. All engineering systems, as well as a roof, a long time need to be replaced, well, at least in thorough repair. For the state of porches, basements, attics, house territories, say not even worth it. In short, everything is running. And running seriously. Until the house is on the maintenance of the city – whose is the headache? That's right, the city authorities. And if or rather, the responsibility for the technical condition of houses is the city Department of Housing, the which is as always a mouse in the barn was hung up on hunger. " Money in the city budget for reconstruction of housing was not, not, and never will, despite the fact that the payment of public utilities on a monthly basis not lower than 90-95%.