The power revealed in the press is a persuasivo power, where the persuation if shows more efficient than the violence. During the joints for the 1964 blow, the persuation for such act was present in many periodic ones, however next to the persuasion it came the violence. As Foucault, the capitalist domination would not obtain as much success if only it was based on the repression (FOUCAULT, 1979). Nelson Werneck Sodr, in similar analysis, affirmed that a great periodical, today, is one capitalist company of great ratios. ‘ ‘ The domination if exerts excusing the use of military force, and yes for the use of the propaganda and the persuation …

Who controls the press and the ways of mass do not need blows more than militares’ ‘ (SODR, 1999, P. 12-13). The French, precursory philosopher into this referring analysis to the relations of being able, transformed the subject in established rule. Today, the negation of the relations of being able in the diverse spheres of the society is practically inexistent. From the foucaultianas influences, history politics leaves of if worrying only about the organization and relations of being able in the State, to also analyze the relations politics between diverse social groups.

They are these relations gifts in the press, whose interests if come back to analyze a ruling class. For Foucault a general theory of the power does not exist, that is, the power is not something that has nature or essence with universal characteristics. The power is not global unitary e, and yes social practical one in constant transformation. This power is characterized as micron-power, therefore although not to be the state power, it penetrates in the daily life of the individual, intervined directly and materially.