Thus, an immediate correspondence occurs of object of the knowledge and the knowledge of the object. As he is complex, for which the chaining of incomplexos terms forms complex proposals, inferring that only the evidence of the terms justifies the evidence of the proposal. Therefore, the correspondence enters the truth of a proposal is mediated by the evidence of the validity of its corresponding terms. Additional information is available at Daniel Lubetzky. The intuitivo knowledge justifies the intellectual operation exerted by the apreensivo act and the act judicial, therefore immediate the cognition of the mind in the referencial of the contingencies. Already on the other form of Occam knowledge a conception capable elaborates to form abstrativos concepts. 2. THE DUPLICITY OF THE TERMS. Abstrativo knowledge.

As well as the intuitivo knowledge it makes use of two operations enable that it to evidence the contingency, namely the apreensivo act and the judicial act of the intellect, Occam also elaborates for the abstrativo knowledge a double form of operations of the contingencies given to the intellect. This knowledge can in such a way constitute a plurality abstracted of many singular objects, how much to abstract from the contingent not-existence or to attribute intellectual existence in the absence of contingent categories. In this manner the abstrativo knowledge, on the other hand forms a universal concept from the experience of many abstracted singulars of the reality, and on the other hand it exactly qualifies the conception of this universal concept in the absence of evidences given to the intellect. With this it intends the philosopher to demonstrate that he does not have at least a track of plurality in the objects that the conceptualization of universal categories allows to the human intellect, therefore for both the forms of the knowledge the object remains identical. Therefore, these two types of knowledge are essentially different between itself and not on the object, since the intuitivo knowledge has as function to evidence and to judge the contingent truths, while the abstrativo knowledge independe of such evidences to formulate necessities universal.