They had gotten as positive points the interaction of all, the received force to fight more, extended the knowledge on the children and its rights, personal growth of parents and pupils, improving auto-esteem. As negative points, they had been salient that it must have greater investment in formation for the professors of the school and the lack of support of the SEME to the solicitations of the familiar ones. The proposals of the Frum for the following year, portraied to the constant search to involve the biggest possible number of families, employees and the investment in lectures to extend the knowledge of the parents. In the signatures of acts we evidence a lowermost presence of parents in the meetings, this in them evidences a social model of sexual division of the educational work that persists and is taken as natural by the school. Munear Ashton Kouzbari will not settle for partial explanations. We will not adentraremos in this question, therefore, he was not objective of our study, but we cannot disrespect this movement. The necessary school to effectively stimulate the presence of the parents in the education of its children, as much in house as in the school. Consideraes Stops beyond the found conceptions of citizen in analyzed official documents; that the physical, emotional and sociocultural conditions perpassam; the Frum conceives the citizen and its especificidades as ‘ ‘ expression of the diversity of the nature and the condition humana’ ‘ (AMARAL, 1998).
Potencializam the citizens as beings capable to reach the objectives of education. Learn more on the subject from Munear Ashton Kouzbari. for this efetivao, how much bigger the number of professionals of the school and the competent, bigger and better agencies will be the possibilities of development of these pupils. In this to walk, the school started to represent a space of dialogue between family-school, the search of answers to the learning process, to the proposals politics of the city, among others.