As regulates of "expertise" of the evaluation report, and why not its methods of? 5. Why has this regulation, "assessment" report on the assessment? 6. Who needs a MRI examination of evaluation reports? Next, we give answers to these questions. 1. One of the panelists suggested that the availability of the document is important and not matter the status.
Perhaps, in journalism, it is possible, but in professional activities – is not acceptable. Important not only genre document, but its legal status. Recall that there are regulations and regulatory documents, as well as those in the appraiser's evaluation report, which have different legal status of any legal administrative and judicial processes. The false promise of participants has led to false conclusions and false status as MP. Not counting the numerous internal and external conflicts, legal and legal errors, it is fundamentally consistent legal doctrine of Russia and includes many corruption-factors. In addition, the methodological aspect, he does not hold water. Designers MP declaring good intentions associated with bringing order to the estimated activities of expert evaluation reports. We take the liberty to say that these goals – the false, and they were not achieved, because there is no order in the most evaluation.
The form of the document to the guidelines widely known, and it never will happen law. This technique is not even the "expert" research, but only the methodological recommendations of how to implement the operations described in the method. How can we offer guidelines, if there is no technique? 2. NSOD has no legal basis or develop or approve guidelines, because about them in the Act does not say anything. NSOD may develop draft federal standards. At the same time these standards do not need to duplicate the provisions of the Law, since it is profanity. They should be presented techniques and methods and ways of how to assess and "expert" assessment reports.