Tag: people & biographies

Is Struts

At the top level, in humans, the individuality of meaning see emerge. But also on the top level applies, what even, more generally the will, due to its fundamental estrangement with: will is movement and be. Is Struts, unrest, conflict. Is need and lack. So suffering. A form of existence is the matter, the space and the time of others. Others who may share this opinion include ICS Security. Most grellsten convey this is human humanum the Bulldogs Ant in Australia as an example: If you cut through this Ant, starts a fight between the head and the tail section; those attacking it with his teeth, and it defends itself by beating and stabbing.

Has the will even objectified is up to the human being, so the appearance is no longer determined at this stage by mechanical forces or mere irritants, but the will creates the resource of the motives and knowledge, to objectify themselves in this stage. With this tool, a second quality in the world occurs: the idea. Man is will not only create, but also imagination, that is to say: the man can look at his will, he can it be the subject Make consideration and knowledge. The will, which was an erkenntnislose, just dark driving force to this level, lit a light up at this stage.” The light of self-knowledge implies the loss of a life orientation of instinct as the flip side, due to the possibility that the Objektivation can be missed en of will in the action now as the flip side: error is possible. All provisions of the Schopenhauer’schen philosophy, including his quite original moral teaching, can be deduced hypothetically from the evidence, that firstly, the will is the primum mover of all expression, and that second human will and intellect contact apart first far enough at their back meet is stacked to come as a surprise. Only man facing his death, which also belongs to the life as a manifestation of will, consciously, and all questions which are not capable to a certain response resulting from this party. The man is not only by Immanual Kant, But even after his disciple of Schopenhauer animal metaphysicum.”

{ Comments are closed }

The Stupidity

Why are some passers-by laugh, others not, is because that some passers-by the Operation with emotions look. In extreme cases they see in the tumbling people themselves; they say: this could happen–me too and in this perspective a feeling of superiority cannot enter, so also no laughter. The fate of the tumbling people other passers-by, however, remains more or less indifferent, they laugh at his blunder and punish them so. Bergson has this aspect in mind when he writes that laughter in its social function is always accompanied by abstractions. Laughter has the character of a social control in this function according to Bergson, making it knowable marginal violations of the norm; Laughter acts as a social gesture, which makes a certain kind of deviating from the course of life and the events visible and at the same time sentenced. “The fear of the humiliation through laughter causes people to be always attentive, not to stiffen, to acknowledge the continuing uniqueness of living phenomena in human togetherness. This social theory of laughter has not remained without opposition. A main objection becomes visible when we once again consider the example: the man who runs across the road, stumbles and falls.

We laugh here, really, as Bergson says, about whose nonconformity, or coarser talked: about his stupidity? Really laugh in its social function expression of malice? We replace for example people, which runs across the road, through an old old man missed the staircase-, why passes us here the laughter? Because the answer, the subject of laughter in its social function not the stupidity of others is not the feeling of the own superiority, social norms, social control, but we ourselves are the subject of laughter, because we have stretched our ideas and expectations in the wrong direction. Not the stupidity of the tumbling people brings us to laugh, but the sudden failure of our expectations. By I’m laughing at this situation, shows me that I have a false expectation was that my judgement in conflict with reality is. An anxiously awaiting, so he put Kant, turned suddenly into nothing, and the affect of this transformation is the laughter. The social function of laughter would go on at the end so the incongruity theory of laughter.

{ Comments are closed }