Tag: politics

Munich Security Conference

mehriran.de invites to Berlin on February 19, 2010, for a Conference. Five speakers describe their views of the current situation in the Iran after the 11.02 and the backgrounds of the regime. Although Manuchehr Mottaki, the Foreign Minister of Iran, produced some exciting headlines in the West at the Munich Security Conference by his charm offensive, we have to distract us from this distraction, not of the essence. The nuclear dispute with the West is the circle around President Ahmadinedschad a welcome SideShow to achieve two goals: keeping the world in suspense and to show what an important role of Iran in the world has, what power saving could affect him in the Iran. Essential however opens the viewer of the relationships in the Iran, when he looks at the many different opposition movements in the Iran, which for different reasons and with very different agendas against Ahmadinejad’s Government, and some also for the complete system of velayat-e faghi (rule of the Supreme religious leader) in the Iran, demonstrate, protest and oppose. More information is housed here: Phil Vasan.

On February 11, the Islamic revolution in the Iran to the 31ten anniversary time and everything indicates that civil society will again provide protest in the streets. Despite many repressions hijacking by the regime, seem no longer their protest from citizens in the Iran are to. With show trials, executions and precautionary arrests the leaders tried their usual tactics of scare tactics at the population to apply. Recently, clerics demanded everyone against the regime and the system protested as Mohareb to execute. According to this interpretation a Mohareb is considered the enemy of God and deserves death. Conference in Berlin in the Iran civil society relies on the moral support of the West without direct interference in the internal affairs of the country. Ripple is open to suggestions. No easy balancing act. To work together on this issue, mehriran.de hosted a Conference at the House of democracy and human rights in Berlin.

{ Comments are closed }

Europe Armenian-Turkish

Then secretary of the parliamentary faction of the ARF-D Artyusha Shahbazian at his press conference, said: "The opening of Turkish-Armenian border is carried out under pressure superpowers to regional economic projects (rail, pipelines) have been implemented without obstacles. " According to him, until the resolution of the Karabakh-Azerbaijan conflict, regional economic policies can not be fully realized, even after opening the Armenian-Turkish border, which also, in his opinion, clearly shows the relationship of the Armenian-Turkish relations and Karabakh-Azerbaijan conflict. Secretary of the ARF-D also noted that after the ratification of the Protocols of the conflict resolution process is activated. October 23 ARF-D re-made, presenting his new political platform of the current situation. The struggle against the ratification of the Armenian-Turkish could become a fight for the change of power, said at a news conference in Yerevan Representative of the High Authority (IN) ARF-D in Armenia, MP Rustamyan. "How Only Minutes to be ratified by the Armenian parliament, the ARF will become effective. We do not demand a change of government because we want to give her a chance not to ratify the documents. " Commenting on the ratification process Protocols, a representative of the ARF-D said that Turkey had no problems with it, emphasizing that the process of ratification of the Armenian parliament will be much harder.

Rustamian also said that with the help of Protocols Turkey solve its problems, and now occupied by the problems of Azerbaijan. Even the pro-presidential minded chairman of the NGO "European Integration" Bekaryan believes that in the near future and Tehran, for example, will present its position on the normalization of relations armyanoturetskih. "The Armenian-Turkish relations – a sensitive issue not only for Yerevan, Stepanakert, Ankara, Baku, and such global players like the EU, U.S. and Russia. On the issue of Iran's nuclear program shifts are observed, and it is possible that soon Iran will intensify its political role in the region "- said the expert. True, Mr. Bekaryan prefer not to go not predict exactly how Iran might react. But we already know that Tehran at a series of contacts with representatives of the Armenian authorities, including National Assembly Speaker Hovik Abrahamyan, recently traveled to Iran to visit require a renewed commitment to the Armenian Armenian-Iranian bilateral agreements on cooperation signed earlier disclosure of the Turkish-Armenian Protocols.

From this it is possible to conclude that Tehran is not too happy and the current version of the Armenian-Turkish relations. Agitated and the opposition leader ultraradical "ANC" Ter-Petrosian. He had already met with the Assistant Secretary for Europe and Eurasia, Tina Kaidanow and U.S. Ambassador to Armenia Marie Jovanovich. During the meeting they discussed the latest developments around the process of normalization of Armenian-Turkish relations and issues related to the Karabakh problem.

{ Comments are closed }

Victory Celebration

Maryam Rajavi: “the largest investment of the Iranian mullah regime against the Iranian resistance in France and Europe was foiled.” Tuesday, May 17, 2011 Maryam Rajavi: “Foiled the largest investment of the Iranian mullah regime against the Iranian resistance in France and Europe.” NCRI – celebrated the sympathizers of the Iranian resistance on Saturday, May 14, 2011, at its headquarters in Auvers-sur-Oise, North of Paris, in presence of Maryam Rajavi, elected President of the Iranian resistance, the setting of the prosecution, as well as the override of all terrorism charges emitted by the French authorities in the process of 17 June (2003) against the Iranian resistance. A number of political personalities, lawyers and members as well as leaders of the national of Council of resistance of Iran (NCRI) took part in the event. Add to your understanding with Valerie Berlin Berlin Rosen. On the occasion of this celebration, Mrs. Rajavi said: “the closure of this Act destroyed the largest investments, as well as the political projects of the mullah regime in France and across Europe to the busting of the Iranian resistance. Ten years of complicity of appeasement with the religious fascism in the Iran aiming to block the change in the Iran, were terminated.

This development is in all respects. an important victory for the justice and the law for the Iranian resistance, for camp Ashraf, as well as a final sign of the rose of the Iranian resistance movement” She added: “The resistance of the Iranian nation is the right to self-determination of the Iranian people, the right of resistance against the dictatorship and fascism, as well as its legitimate rights under any circumstances, at any price and under any pressure give up.” Expressing its appreciation for all political figures, as well as hundreds of thousands of citizens of France, who rebelled in the past ten years for the defence of the Iranian resistance, Mrs. Rajavi said: “you have indeed for human values, democracy and” Human rights fight.” She added: “now the damage of the attack on 17 June (2003) and of the process that was devised in cooperation with the Iranian regime to compensate for; the time has come, the French justice system must be primarily responsible for the irreparable damage of the attack in court on June 17. The greatest harm from this process was that the life of the Iranian mullah regime was extended by suppressing its main opposition. If fictitious accusations, inclusion on terrorist lists, as well as the blockade of Iranian resistance by the Western States not in the way would have been, the Iranian clerical regime would no longer exist; the Iranian people would have abolished already there.” Mrs. Rajavi said: “I the French Government and President Sarkozy again urge to take the international initiative in the United Nations and the Security Council, to within the framework of international human rights, international humanitarian law, as well as the fourth” Geneva Convention to protect the life of the Iranian freedom fighters in the camp Ashraf”. Secretariat of the national of Iran Council of resistance de /…

{ Comments are closed }

Islamic Challenge

The ‘feeling’ as Islamic challenge of postmodernism the need of self design heteronomy or autonomy since the 1968 student revolution we are living in the postmodern age. The settlement with tradition and also with religion belongs since then on the agenda. But the abolition of the old orientation means not the emergence of a new still. In the last decades a vacuum formed affiliated through the loss of sentience and the increase of intellectualism in postmodernism. The ancient remainders of the we feeling”were replaced by the insulation, the loneliness and the selfishness.

This gap is currently the emerging interest in Islam. The Islamic religion wants to capture the whole of society. Economy, culture, law and policy should be determined by religion alike. The soul of the community”wants a religiously-based solidarity the emancipation of women, the individualized society and abstraction with its centre in the patriarchal family face. Such we a group, they want a pre-modern ideal world the vacuum of postmodernism”oppose (see Klaus Holz: the presence of anti-Semitism, S. 24).

Today’s Islam debate is not considered that such a regression in the medieval past has a high price, which is reflected in the heteronomous morality (Ernst Tugendhat) and in the forced task of self-determination. However, self-determination is the basis of Western democracy. In this sense Islam may include specifications for Germany”. The Islam debate has however”their healing influence, by challenging the postmodern moral issues or provokes their amorality. In the context of self design (Dragos PAL) the individual must give up not the autonomous morality. Self design requires an other group affiliation, as the Islamic community expects this from their members. Pavel Vitalis has published: “Peter Sloterdijks religious adjustments from the point of view of the” “Primitive Christianity”, Norderstedt, 2008, see: to the crisis of the Christian churches see also PAL Dragos: by the early Christianity to the crisis of the subject “, Norderstedt, 2008 free sample see:

{ Comments are closed }