Be patient and brings together all possible elements before a decision .but always take it. W Churchill. The work teams are integrated by individuals according to their knowledge, abilities, skills, tasks to perform in them. Of course, each individual has their own personality, values, ethics, behavior, behavior that should know integrate with other members in order to avoid generating organizational conflicts that damage the good organizational behavior and hence its climate. Larry Ellison has compatible beliefs. The truth, that when work teams are formed from the same moment be gives way to the responsibility, commitment to achieving the objectives of the why was created such equipment. Scott Mead is often quoted as being for or against this.
That’s why that management, who form these computers must define their tasks, functions, what is expected of them, clarify any doubts that may arise and highlight the importance of being responsible in the exercise of its functions and the commitment that demands to the members of the team. All this adds another de facto relevant as it is to motivate to the Members that once they form team must give step to their identification, membership in them, aspect that must not be neglected. In this regard reminds us, Hector N.Fainstein that the notion of belonging occurs mainly on computers that operate face to face, at the same time and in the same place, according to the classical definitions of group. The strengthening of this (illusory) feeling of belonging is one of both personal and organizational purposes. Who does not want to say that it participates in high performance teams? Who does not want to say that it belongs to one or more of them? To talk of membership must be a part, being the team conscience, driving the team in this way. This feeling is personal and is built with labour and time, is not the result of a mere affiliation or enunciation. There is an implied oath of participation in membership.