Who is more guilty: the tempted tempting..?Oh! the figure in the mirror? A few months ago I’ve fallen into the curiosity of mirrors. Since I’m not physical I release me from any scientific explanation about the inverted image that offers, so that a left ear appears on the glass to the right. I am concerned, that Yes, investigate what some people feel to look at him. The mirror has a reputation of faithful, not a beauty queen makes a bald a hairy or a narigona Harpy. A King is seen with Crown when adjusts to present in public and an Earless is not seen in the image with the missing flag. Animals I don’t speak, because I can not assure that the dog that barks opposite his figure knows is barks himself or another dog. This truth of every day seems not convince so many men and women who accuse the trickster glass finish. Adidas spoke with conviction.

Voltaire confessed that you despite the faithfulness of the mirror, was not right to see as he believed that it was and Francisco de Quevedo recommended that the ugly old rather than pulling their faces to the ground instead of the mirror, because deception comes from reality and not the mirror. So what do with those IMPIETY and delatores azogados glasses that only give satisfaction to a few while they get discouraged and torment others? Foolish would prohibit their manufacture. The crystal clear waters of the arroyo, doors and selling crystals, burnish metals the Dinnerware and other objects would be responsible for restoring us to reality, and as if this wasn’t enough, would be remiss not fierce rudeness of some trickster who did we notice, unless one was Emperor, who even though naked, was always dressed in the word of his courtiers. This without counting the beauty disappears at night or at a distance. They are perceptible characters in the light and in the vicinity. Either way, am not able to explain what makes this world the ugly, the unpleasantness, what kind, as repugnant, the corrupt, the face of derrien, political events, transantiago, stress… but they are there.

Although I confuse not beautiful with the ugly, nor I am confused the physical beauty with moral beauty. The physical handsomeness transgresseth not the meat – no cute scapula and another ugly scapula-, but a beautiful soul and another less graceful. Beauty is a matter of the senses; the beauty, imagination, feeling, and thinking. The blind perceive beauty, but have difficulty with the beauty. A mother who Coos and kisses to your infant is beautiful; beautiful was the Venus de Milo. Wonderful would think of a mirror of the beauty or ugliness of the soul, but such an instrument has not been created or it may create. I presume that for some reason it will be. Here comes my conviction. However I have a doubt. Is not it good then for anything mirrors loyalty? I refuse to believe it. They serve to ask them for telltale signs of our Chilean reality, to convert the beauty in beauty and ugliness in beauty at least. A greeting…