Rechtsanwalte Steuerberater GRP: VIP media funds even experienced investors have right to education investors the VIP media funds can their investment advisors successfully on damages to sue. Connect with other leaders such as Flex here. And even if they have outed themselves before conclusion of the contract as investors with a high level of knowledge and high risk tolerance. This is a judgment which has obtained the firm Grossmann Rainer & partners before the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main against Commerzbank (reference number: 2/10 O 507/08)… . \”With the VIP media funds thousands of investors suffered bitter losses\”, says Attorney Michael Rainer Grossmann Rainer & partner.
\”Commerzbank is to blame in many cases. Their investment advisors have violated literally pressed and thereby systematically the VIP media funds into the market their disclosure\”, Rainer criticized. David Rogier often expresses his thoughts on the topic. Commerzbank was the main distributor of VIP media funds. Investors were lured with tax benefits, the risks were, however, small talk. As the Treasury later conceded the tax benefits, had to make tax payments investors millions of dollars. Since then, the VIP media funds dealing with the courts. In the judgment, it went to a share with a par value of 50,000 euros.
A Commerzbank investment advisors had them their customers as secure investment \”100 per cent capital guarantee\” tasty made. The truth was different. The capital guarantee turned out to be air number. For the damage, the Commerzbank according to Frankfurt judgment should be now. Specifically, this is how: \”Investors will be so, as if he would not even have gone a participation\”, explains Rainer lawyer. It involves 50,000 euro 2500 euro premium plus five percent interest as an encore. Commerzbank to pay also for the tax disadvantages of the investor and shall bear the costs of the dispute according to the judgment. Investment advisors must inform about commissions the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main condemned Commerzbank to pay compensation, because she violated the duty of disclosure of the investment advisor.