Although sometimes the circumstances do not make it possible, to anybody it escapes to him that generally the best form of safekeeping on the common children after the rupture of a pair is the one of shared type. Of what an agreement of shared safekeeping consists? It is precise to clarify that this modality of safekeeping does not imply unlike which many people could believe, a perfectly equitable distribution of his time, to the fifty percent, between both ancestors. On the contrary, it supposes that both they share responsibilities on the same in the day to day, having to cooperate and to act of mutual agreement in the subjects regarding the minor. As far as the distribution of the time with them, this one could be realised as both ancestors would agree. Thus, this could work although the children would much more spend time with one of them who with the other. Their more remarkable aspects Obvious are an ideal option, because it supposes a total implication on the part of both ex- companions in the life of his children, without having to be neither besides the same.
Nevertheless, it requires of a concerted effort and commitment so that it can work of suitable way. this topic. It can absolutely not be pleasant to see an ex- pair of form continued after the rupture, but of not taking place that fluid relation this modality of safekeeping never could work. In addition, it is clear that with time rubbing and disagreements will arise. To speak with tranquillity and of constructive form will be the best form to lead back the situation and to give back the calm to this safekeeping. The necessity to respect the rules an indispensable element in all regime of safekeeping, and especially in the shared one, is the necessity to fix and to respect a certain discipline and direction for the children, so that these feel that the rules on which they must rely do not change from a home to another one. And it is that it is common after the divorce that one of the parents behavior of form stricter than the other, which can finish being amazing for those. For this reason, both would have to be put in agreement on aspects like the hour to go to sleep, the gifts or the accomplishment of the scholastic tasks. On the other hand, in no case the authority of the other ancestor in front of the children would be due to reduce.
On the contrary, it is precise to maintain the possible rubbing with that one in private, showing in front of the children a common position. Really, it is necessary to leave to the rage and the resentment that could feel sometimes towards the other of a side, establishing as priority to take care of properly to the needs of the children and not to interfere with the safekeeping of the other ancestor. Conclusions to consider Being respected all these basic principles can be possible that an agreement of shared safekeeping can work actually. A dialogue flowed with the ex- pair will be fundamental in it, and in spite of the worries and the frustrations that could entail, in the end it will be worth the pain to decide on this modality of safekeeping.